Squeezing 9dB from a dipole

Do you have general comments, notes or questions you'd like to share with others? This is the place.
Post Reply
Andrew (grayhat)
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:59 pm

Squeezing 9dB from a dipole

Post by Andrew (grayhat) »

I've always loved simple antennas and the dipole is one of the most common and simple ones; for such a reason time ago I started investigating about ways to maximize the performances of the dipole and, time ago, found a paper from Jari Perkiömäki (OH6BG) which explains how, using some optimal (yet manageable) heights one may squeeze quite some dBs out of a humble dipole (and other horizontally polarized antennas), the paper doesn't seem to be available online anymore, but luckily it can still be found at the "wayback machine", here

http://web.archive.org/web/202306081935 ... of-dipole/

as you can see, by placing our dipole at an height of 0.6 Lambda, which is still manageable for the upper HF frequencies, it's possible to achieve a gain above 7dBi, not bad at all, but then, being the kind of "hard headed" folk I am, I kept thinking at ways to further increase the gain and finally found it

The idea isn't new, but I think it hasn't been "explored" at full, basically the idea is to start with our dipole placed at 0.6 Lambda and fed with coax and then place a second dipole of the same size right above the first one at a distance from the first of about 0.6 ... 0.7 Lambda, this second "upper" dipole won't be connected to the coax; with such a setup we'll go from the (about) 7.8dBi of the single dipole to more than 9.1 dBi !

Now, the ones with keen eyes here probably noticed an issue with such a setup, that is... the required height; as an example, willing to setup our stacked dipoles for the 10 meters band, the lower one would be at about 6 meters from ground, while the second one would be at about 14 meters from ground, not exactly a manageable setup, yet the config will be usable from the 6 meters band and up (...2 meters...) offering manageable size (and height) and mantaining the more than 9dBi gain

For the interested ones, here's the 4NEC2 model (the comments show what to change in case one wants to use the model for other frequencies, basically one starts by changing "freq" and then optimizing "lfac" to adjust the dipole length for minimum SWR and next we optimize "fbds" to adjust the vertical spacing between the two dipoles for max gain at the desired takeoff angle)

Code: Select all

CM ----------------------------------------------------------------
CM File: stacked_dipole.nec
CM
CM twin stacked dipoles
CM ----------------------------------------------------------------
CE

SY freq=144                     ' desired freq
SY test=freq
SY wire=0.00125
            
SY lfac=1.0311                  ' adjust for SWR
SY wave=(300/freq)
SY leng=(wave/2)*lfac
            
SY cent=0.02
SY arms=(leng/2)-(2*cent)
            
SY hfac=0.60
SY feed=(wave*hfac)
            
SY hvar=0
SY term=feed+hvar

SY fbds=0.6889                  ' adjust for lobe
SY feeB=feed+(wave*fbds)
SY terB=feeB+hvar

            
SY segl=51
SY segm=31
SY segs=3

SY fedw=1
SY feds=(segs/2)

SY vert=abs(feed-term)
SY endp=(sqr(abs((arms^2)-(vert^2))))

GW  1 segs  0 -cent feed 0  cent feed wire
GW  2 segl  0 -cent feed 0 -endp term wire
GW  3 segl  0  cent feed 0  endp term wire


GW  4 segs  0 -cent feeB 0  cent feeB wire
GW  5 segl  0 -cent feeB 0 -endp terB wire
GW  6 segl  0  cent feeB 0  endp terB wire


GE   1

GN  2  0  0  0  13  0.005

LD  7  0  0  0  2.1  wire
LD  5  0  0  0  58000000

EK

EX  0  fedw  feds  0  1.0  0  0 

FR  0  0  0  0  test  0

EN
just copy it, paste into an editor (e.g. notepad) and save as "stacked_dipole.nec", then load it into 4NEC2 and you'll be able to play with the results and with the model, for the curious ones, here is the NEC output for a stacked dipole calculated for the 2m band

https://postimg.cc/tndHCP46

Image

as you can see, the "upper dipole" has the effect of "squishing" the lobe so lowering the takeoff angle and increasing the gain, the typical "hunch" of the dipole is reduced a lot and this, in turn, results in a gain increase; such an antenna has really "handy" size for the 2m band and may be useful for SOTA or for portable use; also notice that the gain is good even going below the main takeoff angle, it shows 6.6dBi at 8° and 3.26dBi at 5°, not bad I think :D
N8TGQ
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:06 am

Re: Squeezing 9dB from a dipole

Post by N8TGQ »

How did it work for you?
Rick N8TGQ
Andrew (grayhat)
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:59 pm

Re: Squeezing 9dB from a dipole

Post by Andrew (grayhat) »

N8TGQ wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:57 am How did it work for you?
Exactly as described, tried that with a 10 meters band dipole and the difference in gain and takeoff angle was definitely perceivable even without running a full blown field measurement, repeated the tests on 6m and 2m bands and got the same results, so confirming that what's stated in the paper from OH6BG is correct and repeatable
Post Reply